Dear Readers,
Premise
Okay, I set up a survey monkey. My goal was to collect data from local crossers on their favorite courses and try to see what are favorite courses and are there any consistent characteristics between local favorites. I'll put this out there, this is not a scientific survey at all. The pool of respondents is roughly 60 folks. I put the survey out on Facebook and twitter. I know that to some extent that skews the responses. I mean I am assuming that not too many people choose to follow on me on FB/Twitter do so because they think I'm a total asshole. I also know that because I am located in the Mid Atlantic the results primary focused on races in this region, although not all answers were from the region. I'll add I am no Nate Silver and no Colin Reuter. All of this was for fun and information purposes only. Finally, I tried to focus on course characteristics not overall production value.
Four Mid Atlantic Cyclocross Monuments:
Okay, this has nothing to do with the survey, and is purely my opinion. As I see it, in Mid Atlantic Cyclocross there are 4 Monument races. They are Nittany, Granogue, Charm City Cross and DCCX. These races are highly regarded, known for high levels of production value, great venues, and unique features. They are all the total package from an event standpoint. In the survey, it's clear that from a course design standpoint these races are getting it right, but also in the sense of an event, they are nailing it.
"Hey Faticus what about HPCX!?" yeah there's probably a good argument that HPCX could be listed as one of the monuments. I just don't put in on par with the other four. While I admit I haven't been to HPCX in 2 years, historically the production value, following (rider numbers) and as fleshed out in this survey-course design have not been on par with the other monuments.
I know what you're thinking, didn't you just say this survey was based on course design only and not production value? Yeah, but the whole monuments thing is purely something I invented in my head, and unlike for the survey I looked at the entire event. Again, this was something I made up not really official anyway. That said, as we dive into the survey results you'll see why I called out the Monuments as I did.
I'd also say that if I was in the business of running series, I think it would be pretty damn awesome if the 4 Mid Atlantic Monuments got together and made a series. Yeah, Granogue is just one day, but couple that with a Beacon or West Chester, or another of the emerging races and you'd have a pretty bad ass 4 week/8 race series. Hell, 3 of 4 weekends are UCI, that's just another UCI weekend from being an amazing UCI series... But again, I'm kinda out of that business.
Favorite Courses:
Looking at the the results from just question one: What is your favorite 'cross course? This is how it broke down.
These results are further reinforced when we combine all the results from the respondents top 3 favorite courses:
What I find most interesting here is that Providence, which is NECX and not Mid Atlantic comes in so highly. I'll admit I didn't take the survey, but Providence would have made my top three. I also think that's a statement about what those guys are doing right. Here's a couple of quotes regarding the Providence course:
"
great terrain, interesting challenges (run ups, snow at nationals), roller coaster hills"
"Constant changes. Off cambers, up and down like a roller coaster, flyovers, stairs, great pit, great scene, great start grid"
"an onslaught of fast sections, technical turns on bad ground, fly overs, box jumps, stairs, planks, no respite. has it all with lanes wide enough for the big fields..."
Cheers to Richard Fries and company for that...
here's the other big question what do respondents want to see in a cross course?
"technical challenges, flow, good pit layout, paved start/finish sections. lack of gravel. sand pits. climbing. features that take a bit of time and/or experience to figure out. more technical challenges"
"I like course where there's not a lot of repetition, so I look for a course designer to make creative use of the space he/she has. Courses that are just one thing (either all power, or all driving) get boring to me, so the best courses have both. I also like courses with technical challenges. Man-made dismounts are good, but natural dismounts are better. I like a course designer to use all the terrain they have at their disposal to make something interesting."
"Run ups. Stairs. Swoopy, flowing descents. Not just endless tape, gratuitous spirals and grass crits. NOT bumpy ruts."
"Use the available space to do something not seen in other courses around the area, if possible. Whether elevation change or some technical feature, I like something that stands out and is different. Also at least one feature that makes my sphincter pucker is good. (DCCX - the "M" turn, Charm City - downhill right hander to stairs, uphill off-camber; Reston - "The Chute" bombing into a mud bog, etc)"
"1.Technicality, turns that require thought and skill to maneuver at speed. 2. Multiple (at least 2 but 3 is better) dismounts/options per lap. This is a cx specific skill set, if you don't practice it, too bad. Go race a crit. 3. Good flow. I like when a huge power section is followed by a section that is technical/turny. This balances the force by allowing those of us who just buried themselves to stay on the wheel of the roadie to dole out the pain in return. 3. At no point should there ever be a spiral of death,doom,or love. "
So what do respondents think the Monuments get right?:
Charm City:
"You have to have fitness, skill and you're off the bike 3 times per lap minimum , stairs and sand = rad"
DCCX :
"Stairs, ups and downs, brick pavers, off-camber hill and the amazing park-like venue in the heart of DC"
Nittany:
"Nice flow, mixed terrain. Power sections and climbing. The fact that it is the first major race of the year,
makes it even better "
Granogue:
"Great people, hard climbs, hard descents, enough dismounts, amazing crowds, ensures tight racing. The people and the atmosphere really make this race the best. Granogue is just a special place."
So let's dive in deeper and take out the Monument Races looking at all responses pulling out the 4 Monuments and Providence:
My thoughts:
Interesting that Sly Fox- a first time race makes a splash. The only first year race to make the survey. With a year under their belt, I expect this year will be even better. Based on it's technical characteristics, I'm not totally surprised.The course is technical and has a unique feature (their run up).
Winchester and West Chester are getting some love too. Based on the data I think both of these races will continue to grow and emerge. I haven't made Winchester yet, I'm gonna have to get down there in the next couple of years.
Interesting that the now defunct Beacon comes in so strongly. From a course standpoint it's such a unique venue and a great course, but I know in the past few years they struggled to draw a crowds.
The re-born Cap Classic gets strong marks, another example of a course with a signature feature.
Fairhill (Gallagher) is understated as an event, but really is one of the best courses in the region. Not surprised it showed up here. NECX sneaks in with Gloucester- which is just a race that I recommend everyone does at least once.
Here's some of the love:
Cap Classic:
"Gnarly descent and always epic conditions"
Fairhill :
"small town feel, nice mix of toughness, off camber, punch in the gut climb"
West Chester CX :
"Fast and flowy with more punchy little ups per lap than seem possible. Roomy venue with a nice grass roots vibe. Did I mention fast?"
Rockburn
:
"Some "singletrack", sand, lots of mixed terrain (power climbs, off camber turns, high speed descents), technical"
Sly Fox:
"Crowd, venue, log hill run up. log hop was cool, good turns for bike drivers and barrier location was perfect."
Winchester Apple Cross:
"I like the steep climbs and the turns are really well laid out to connect together; no meaningless dead stop 180s one after the other; there is also a variety of terrain--tarmac, grass, dirt through the woods"
Gone but not forgotten:
I kinda love that some of the races that have stopped got mentioned in the survey. Beacon obviously got a lot of attention but other retired races getting love included Wiss Cross (Ludwig's corner) , Geler Votre Cul (Fairhill Fairgrounds), Pittsfield (NECX), Camp Hill and even Monkey Hill all garnered praise.
Questions I wish I asked:
First is there a race that may not be one of the best, but that you like? Or a race that may be appropriate as an early season shake down but not in the heart of Crosstober? (ex: Blunt Park in MA, and even Cross of the Corn this year)... Additionally I wished I'd asked what race do you see getting strong or better? What race do you recommend but might not be one of your 3 favorites? An example there for me would be CSI (Look Park, MA) great course, very balanced, always have fun, but not gonna make my top three. Crossasaurus is similar I love that race, highly recommend it, but it wouldn't make my top 3. All essentially trying to get another slice at what works as a cross course.
Most Important Question:
Who is cuter Fatmarc or James Franco:
Well clearly 70% of folks get this right, and the other 30% of you, Well, I recommend that you see an eye doctor shortly. There's only one right answer to this question. Only one right answer.
In Closing:
Promoting races is really hard work. Thankless work for the most part. Designing a course, Finding venues even tougher. I remember our first Granogue Course in 2001. It sucked really badly. Like seriously, I'm so glad no one remembers that race that was both in the PACX and the MAC. It's super easy to say that a course needs to flow, but creating flow is much harder. I think the key is to go to other races, see what works, ride courses, ask for help... A personal observation would be that the Mid Atlantic lacks run ups. People love to hate run ups. We need more run ups. Most of all thanks to all the promoters out there that help our region to have such a rich, and diverse schedule. Thanks to everyone who took the time to take the survey and share your thoughts.
What am I missing? Questions? Your interpretation?
thanks for reading!
respect
fatmarc